Orforglipron vs NA-931
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research
Also: LY3502970, OWL833
Orforglipron is Eli Lilly's oral, once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist, and the headline is that it is a small molecule, not a peptide, so it survives the gut and can be taken as a plain pill with no food or water restrictions. It is being developed for type 2 diabetes and obesity and has completed multiple successful Phase 3 trials. As of mid-2026 it is filed for regulatory review but not yet approved.
Also: Bioglutide, cyclic glycine-proline
NA-931 (Bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of IGF-1. Its developer, Biomed Industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person Phase 2 trial. Those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to ClinicalTrials.gov. The same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a Sigma-Aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify.
Key Comparison Insights
- Orforglipron is FDA approved, while NA-931 remains in research stages.
- Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.
- Orforglipron has stronger research evidence (FDA Approved) compared to NA-931 (Phase II Completed, Unpublished).
Detailed Comparison
| Attribute | Orforglipron | NA-931 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Weight Loss | Weight Loss |
| FDA Status | FDA Approved | Not FDA Approved |
| Clinical Status | Pre I II III IV FDA | Pre I II III IV FDA |
| Mechanism of Action | Orforglipron activates the same GLP-1 receptor that injectable drugs like semaglutide target, which curbs appetite, slows stomach emptying, and triggers insulin release when blood sugar is high. The difference is chemistry. Semaglutide is a fragile peptide that the digestive tract chews up, which is why it normally needs an injection or a specially formulated pill taken on an empty stomach. Orforglipron is a non-peptide small molecule engineered to bind the same receptor while being stable enough to swallow like any other tablet. Same biological lever, far more convenient delivery. | Cyclic glycine-proline is a diketopiperazine: glycine and proline joined into a small ring, 154 daltons, roughly a thirtieth the size of tirzepatide or retatrutide. The independent literature, mostly from Jian Guan's group in Auckland, describes a single mechanism: cGP competes with IGF-1 for binding to IGFBP-3, which frees up IGF-1 that was otherwise bound and inactive. That is a bioavailability effect, studied for stroke recovery, Parkinson's and blood pressure rather than for weight. Biomed's own patent filing (WO2025160184A1) goes much further, claiming the same molecule is a 'quadruple receptor agonist' at IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. That claim is worth understanding properly, because it is the entire basis of the weight-loss story. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors are class B GPCRs, the kind that normally need a thirty-plus residue peptide wrapping into the receptor's binding groove to switch on. A 154-dalton ring activating all three would be a genuinely significant pharmacological finding. No independent group has reported it. Searching PubMed for cyclic glycine-proline alongside GLP-1 returns nothing at all. |
| Common Dosing | Limited community data available See research protocols | 120 mg daily, oral Once daily |
| Administration | Oral tablet daily | Oral capsule or tablet, once daily |
| Typical Duration | Long-term use expected | 28 days in Phase 1, 13 weeks in Phase 2 |
| Best Time to Take | Before bed or morning (fasted) | Consistent daily timing |
Possible Side Effects May vary by individual |
|
|
| Research Summary | The evidence base here is strong and recent, anchored by large Phase 3 programs. In the obesity ATTAIN-1 trial (72 weeks), all three doses beat placebo for weight loss, and full results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. ATTAIN-2, in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes, was published in The Lancet and showed clinically meaningful weight loss plus improvements in waist circumference, blood pressure, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. On the diabetes side, ACHIEVE-1 was the first Phase 3 win for any oral small-molecule GLP-1 drug, and in the head-to-head ACHIEVE-3 trial orforglipron beat oral semaglutide on both A1C and weight. Side effects mirror the rest of the GLP-1 class: mostly nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, generally mild to moderate. The realistic read is that this is a genuine breakthrough in delivery rather than a brand-new mechanism, and approval decisions are expected to follow the completed filings. | There are no peer-reviewed publications on NA-931. Not one. Everything in circulation is a conference abstract, and the abstracts carrying the efficacy numbers list Biomed's CEO as sole author with conflicts declared as 'None'. Two trials have completed, both run entirely in Australia: a 74-person Phase 1 (NCT06615700, completed September 2024) and a 126-person Phase 2 (NCT06564753, completed April 2025). Neither has results posted. A third trial (NCT06732245) would run in the US, Australia and New Zealand, but has not started recruiting. The reported weight loss is where this gets difficult. The same 126-person Phase 2 has been presented three times with three different numbers: 14.8 percent at ADA in June 2025, 13.8 percent at ENDO in July, and 13.8 percent with a different placebo-adjusted figure in a September press release. Enrolment is given as 125 in the abstracts against 126 on the registry. A result that moves between presentations is not yet a result. The company's website states NA-931 is in Phase 3. No Phase 3 trial for NA-931 is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The announcement traces to a single paid newswire release in January 2026, syndicated into around twenty local newspaper press-release sections, which reads like broad coverage but is one purchased placement. |
Frequently Asked Questions: Orforglipron vs NA-931
What is the difference between Orforglipron and NA-931?
Orforglipron is a weight loss peptide that orforglipron is eli lilly's oral, once-daily glp-1 receptor agonist, and the headline is that it is a small molecule, not a peptide, so it survives the gut and can be taken as a plain pill with no food or water restrictions. it is being developed for type 2 diabetes and obesity and has completed multiple successful phase 3 trials. as of mid-2026 it is filed for regulatory review but not yet approved. NA-931 is a weight loss peptide that na-931 (bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of igf-1. its developer, biomed industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - igf-1, glp-1, gip and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person phase 2 trial. those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to clinicaltrials.gov. the same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a sigma-aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.
Which is better, Orforglipron or NA-931?
Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. Orforglipron is typically used for weight loss purposes, while NA-931 is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.
Can Orforglipron and NA-931 be used together?
Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using Orforglipron and NA-931 together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.