Tirzepatide vs NA-931
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research
Also: Mounjaro, Zepbound
Tirzepatide is a single peptide that activates two receptors at once: GIP and GLP-1, the two main incretin hormones your gut releases after eating. It is FDA-approved as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and as Zepbound for chronic weight management and obstructive sleep apnea, and it has produced the largest weight-loss numbers of any approved drug to date. Like semaglutide, this is a heavily trialed, fully approved medicine, not a gray-market research compound.
Also: Bioglutide, cyclic glycine-proline
NA-931 (Bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of IGF-1. Its developer, Biomed Industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person Phase 2 trial. Those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to ClinicalTrials.gov. The same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a Sigma-Aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify.
Key Comparison Insights
- Tirzepatide is FDA approved, while NA-931 remains in research stages.
- Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.
- Tirzepatide has stronger research evidence (FDA Approved) compared to NA-931 (Phase II Completed, Unpublished).
Detailed Comparison
| Attribute | Tirzepatide | NA-931 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Weight Loss | Weight Loss |
| FDA Status | FDA Approved | Not FDA Approved |
| Clinical Status | Pre I II III IV FDA | Pre I II III IV FDA |
| Mechanism of Action | Tirzepatide is a dual agonist, meaning it switches on both the GIP receptor and the GLP-1 receptor with one molecule. GLP-1 activation boosts glucose-dependent insulin release, suppresses glucagon, slows gastric emptying, and reduces appetite through the brain. Adding GIP activation appears to enhance insulin response and improve how fat tissue handles energy, and the combination seems to outperform hitting GLP-1 alone. As with semaglutide, the peptide carries a fatty-acid chain that binds albumin to extend its half-life enough for once-weekly dosing. The exact reason the GIP arm adds so much benefit is still being worked out, but the clinical effect of combining the two is clear. | Cyclic glycine-proline is a diketopiperazine: glycine and proline joined into a small ring, 154 daltons, roughly a thirtieth the size of tirzepatide or retatrutide. The independent literature, mostly from Jian Guan's group in Auckland, describes a single mechanism: cGP competes with IGF-1 for binding to IGFBP-3, which frees up IGF-1 that was otherwise bound and inactive. That is a bioavailability effect, studied for stroke recovery, Parkinson's and blood pressure rather than for weight. Biomed's own patent filing (WO2025160184A1) goes much further, claiming the same molecule is a 'quadruple receptor agonist' at IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. That claim is worth understanding properly, because it is the entire basis of the weight-loss story. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors are class B GPCRs, the kind that normally need a thirty-plus residue peptide wrapping into the receptor's binding groove to switch on. A 154-dalton ring activating all three would be a genuinely significant pharmacological finding. No independent group has reported it. Searching PubMed for cyclic glycine-proline alongside GLP-1 returns nothing at all. |
| Common Dosing | 5-15 mg weekly (after titration) Once weekly | 120 mg daily, oral Once daily |
| Administration | Subcutaneous injection weekly | Oral capsule or tablet, once daily |
| Typical Duration | Long-term / chronic use | 28 days in Phase 1, 13 weeks in Phase 2 |
| Best Time to Take | Morning, same day each week | Consistent daily timing |
Possible Side Effects May vary by individual |
|
|
| Research Summary | The trial evidence is strong and recent. In SURMOUNT-1 (New England Journal of Medicine, 2022), adults with obesity but without diabetes lost an average of 22.5% of body weight on the 15 mg dose over 72 weeks, versus 2.4% on placebo, with about 9 in 10 participants losing weight. In a head-to-head trial, SURMOUNT-5 (2025), tirzepatide produced roughly 20% weight loss versus about 14% for semaglutide. The SURPASS diabetes program showed strong HbA1c reductions, and a large cardiovascular outcomes trial supported its safety profile. Side effects mirror other incretin drugs: mostly nausea, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal issues, generally worst during dose titration. These are large, randomized, peer-reviewed trials, putting tirzepatide among the best-evidenced metabolic drugs available. | There are no peer-reviewed publications on NA-931. Not one. Everything in circulation is a conference abstract, and the abstracts carrying the efficacy numbers list Biomed's CEO as sole author with conflicts declared as 'None'. Two trials have completed, both run entirely in Australia: a 74-person Phase 1 (NCT06615700, completed September 2024) and a 126-person Phase 2 (NCT06564753, completed April 2025). Neither has results posted. A third trial (NCT06732245) would run in the US, Australia and New Zealand, but has not started recruiting. The reported weight loss is where this gets difficult. The same 126-person Phase 2 has been presented three times with three different numbers: 14.8 percent at ADA in June 2025, 13.8 percent at ENDO in July, and 13.8 percent with a different placebo-adjusted figure in a September press release. Enrolment is given as 125 in the abstracts against 126 on the registry. A result that moves between presentations is not yet a result. The company's website states NA-931 is in Phase 3. No Phase 3 trial for NA-931 is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The announcement traces to a single paid newswire release in January 2026, syndicated into around twenty local newspaper press-release sections, which reads like broad coverage but is one purchased placement. |
Frequently Asked Questions: Tirzepatide vs NA-931
What is the difference between Tirzepatide and NA-931?
Tirzepatide is a weight loss peptide that tirzepatide is a single peptide that activates two receptors at once: gip and glp-1, the two main incretin hormones your gut releases after eating. it is fda-approved as mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and as zepbound for chronic weight management and obstructive sleep apnea, and it has produced the largest weight-loss numbers of any approved drug to date. like semaglutide, this is a heavily trialed, fully approved medicine, not a gray-market research compound. NA-931 is a weight loss peptide that na-931 (bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of igf-1. its developer, biomed industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - igf-1, glp-1, gip and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person phase 2 trial. those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to clinicaltrials.gov. the same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a sigma-aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.
Which is better, Tirzepatide or NA-931?
Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. Tirzepatide is typically used for weight loss purposes, while NA-931 is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.
Can Tirzepatide and NA-931 be used together?
Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using Tirzepatide and NA-931 together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.