For laboratory and research use only. Not for human consumption.
Comparison

NA-931 vs Amycretin

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research

NA-931

Also: Bioglutide, cyclic glycine-proline

Clinical Trials

NA-931 (Bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of IGF-1. Its developer, Biomed Industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person Phase 2 trial. Those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to ClinicalTrials.gov. The same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a Sigma-Aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify.

Weight LossPhase II Completed, Unpublished
Amycretin

Also: Zenagamtide, NNC0487-0111

Clinical Trials

Amycretin is Novo Nordisk's single-molecule agonist of both the GLP-1 and amylin receptors, developed as a once-weekly injection and a once-daily pill. Early trials produced some of the biggest weight-loss numbers seen with any obesity drug so far, and the injectable version entered phase 3 (the AMAZE program) in 2026. It is not approved anywhere, and everything known about it comes from company-run trials of up to 36 weeks.

Weight LossHuman Trials

Key Comparison Insights

  • Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.

Detailed Comparison

AttributeNA-931Amycretin
CategoryWeight LossWeight Loss
FDA StatusNot FDA ApprovedNot FDA Approved
Clinical Status
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Mechanism of ActionCyclic glycine-proline is a diketopiperazine: glycine and proline joined into a small ring, 154 daltons, roughly a thirtieth the size of tirzepatide or retatrutide. The independent literature, mostly from Jian Guan's group in Auckland, describes a single mechanism: cGP competes with IGF-1 for binding to IGFBP-3, which frees up IGF-1 that was otherwise bound and inactive. That is a bioavailability effect, studied for stroke recovery, Parkinson's and blood pressure rather than for weight. Biomed's own patent filing (WO2025160184A1) goes much further, claiming the same molecule is a 'quadruple receptor agonist' at IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. That claim is worth understanding properly, because it is the entire basis of the weight-loss story. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors are class B GPCRs, the kind that normally need a thirty-plus residue peptide wrapping into the receptor's binding groove to switch on. A 154-dalton ring activating all three would be a genuinely significant pharmacological finding. No independent group has reported it. Searching PubMed for cyclic glycine-proline alongside GLP-1 returns nothing at all.Amycretin hits two appetite systems at once. The GLP-1 side slows stomach emptying, boosts insulin release after meals, and dampens appetite in the brain, the same biology behind semaglutide. The amylin side mimics a hormone your pancreas releases alongside insulin, which acts on the brainstem to make you feel full sooner and also curbs glucagon after eating. Novo combined these two signals in one molecule rather than mixing two drugs (which is what its CagriSema combination does). The bet is that the two pathways add together, giving more weight loss than either alone. That idea fits the early data, but it has not yet been tested head-to-head against semaglutide or tirzepatide in a large trial.
Common Dosing
120 mg daily, oral
Once daily
Trial doses of 1.25-40 mg once weekly (injection)
Once weekly (injection) or once daily (tablet)
AdministrationOral capsule or tablet, once dailySubcutaneous injection once weekly, or oral tablet once daily (separate formulations)
Typical Duration28 days in Phase 1, 13 weeks in Phase 220-36 weeks in published trials; phase 3 runs longer
Best Time to TakeConsistent daily timingSame day each week (injection); trial protocols set timing for the tablet
Possible Side Effects
May vary by individual
  • No peer-reviewed safety data exists
  • Company reports diarrhea in 2.3 percent versus 10 percent on placebo, from a conference abstract only
  • Cyclic glycine-proline occurs naturally in the body and is sold as a supplement, so acute toxicity is unlikely
  • The four-receptor mechanism that would drive weight loss has never been independently confirmed
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhea and constipation
  • Reduced appetite
  • GI effects rise with dose and are most common during escalation
  • +2 more
Research SummaryThere are no peer-reviewed publications on NA-931. Not one. Everything in circulation is a conference abstract, and the abstracts carrying the efficacy numbers list Biomed's CEO as sole author with conflicts declared as 'None'. Two trials have completed, both run entirely in Australia: a 74-person Phase 1 (NCT06615700, completed September 2024) and a 126-person Phase 2 (NCT06564753, completed April 2025). Neither has results posted. A third trial (NCT06732245) would run in the US, Australia and New Zealand, but has not started recruiting. The reported weight loss is where this gets difficult. The same 126-person Phase 2 has been presented three times with three different numbers: 14.8 percent at ADA in June 2025, 13.8 percent at ENDO in July, and 13.8 percent with a different placebo-adjusted figure in a September press release. Enrolment is given as 125 in the abstracts against 126 on the registry. A result that moves between presentations is not yet a result. The company's website states NA-931 is in Phase 3. No Phase 3 trial for NA-931 is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The announcement traces to a single paid newswire release in January 2026, syndicated into around twenty local newspaper press-release sections, which reads like broad coverage but is one purchased placement.Two early trials were published in The Lancet in June 2025. In the subcutaneous phase 1b/2a trial (125 adults with overweight or obesity), the estimated weight loss assuming full adherence was 24.3% at 60 mg over 36 weeks and 22.0% at 20 mg over 36 weeks, versus roughly flat weight on placebo, with no plateau by the end of treatment. A separate phase 1 trial of the oral tablet (144 people, 12 weeks) showed up to 13.1% loss at the highest dose. In November 2025 Novo reported a 36-week phase 2 trial in 448 adults with type 2 diabetes: up to 14.5% weight loss with weekly injections (2.6% on placebo), up to 10.1% with the daily pill, and HbA1c drops of up to 1.8 points. Side effects were mostly gastrointestinal, dose-related, and mild to moderate. Novo moved both forms into phase 3; AMAZE 1 (weekly injection at 1.25, 5, 20 or 40 mg versus placebo, about 1,150 people without diabetes) is registered as NCT07339423 with completion expected in 2029. Honest caveats: the headline numbers come from small trials using an efficacy estimand that assumes everyone stayed on drug, and long-term safety is unknown.

Frequently Asked Questions: NA-931 vs Amycretin

What is the difference between NA-931 and Amycretin?

NA-931 is a weight loss peptide that na-931 (bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of igf-1. its developer, biomed industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - igf-1, glp-1, gip and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person phase 2 trial. those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to clinicaltrials.gov. the same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a sigma-aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify. Amycretin is a weight loss peptide that amycretin is novo nordisk's single-molecule agonist of both the glp-1 and amylin receptors, developed as a once-weekly injection and a once-daily pill. early trials produced some of the biggest weight-loss numbers seen with any obesity drug so far, and the injectable version entered phase 3 (the amaze program) in 2026. it is not approved anywhere, and everything known about it comes from company-run trials of up to 36 weeks. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Which is better, NA-931 or Amycretin?

Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. NA-931 is typically used for weight loss purposes, while Amycretin is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.

Can NA-931 and Amycretin be used together?

Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using NA-931 and Amycretin together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.

Related Comparisons

View Full Peptide Profiles