For laboratory and research use only. Not for human consumption.
Comparison

GB-115 vs Davunetide

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research

GB-115

Also: Ranquilon, N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester

Clinical Trials

GB-115 is a synthetic dipeptide anxiolytic developed in Russia, chemically the amide of N-phenylhexanoyl-glycyl-L-tryptophan and described as a retro-analogue of cholecystokinin-4. Rather than acting like a benzodiazepine, it blocks cholecystokinin receptors, a different anti-anxiety route. It has been studied in animals and in a small pilot human study, but it is not an approved or widely available medication.

CognitiveHuman Trials
Davunetide

Also: NAP, AL-108

Clinical Trials

Davunetide (NAP) is an eight-amino-acid fragment (NAPVSIPQ) of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP), discovered at Tel Aviv University and given as a nasal spray. It was meant to protect brain cells by stabilizing microtubules, the scaffolding that tau normally supports. Its big test, a phase 2/3 trial in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), failed cleanly in 2012, and development stalled. It has since been revived by its inventors, who argue it works in women and are pursuing ADNP syndrome, but those claims rest on reanalyses of old data, not a new successful trial.

CognitiveHuman Trials

Key Comparison Insights

  • Both peptides belong to the Cognitive category, suggesting similar primary applications.

Detailed Comparison

AttributeGB-115Davunetide
CategoryCognitiveCognitive
FDA StatusNot FDA ApprovedNot FDA Approved
Clinical Status
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Mechanism of ActionCholecystokinin (CCK) is a peptide that acts as a neurotransmitter in the brain, and activating its CCK-2 (also called CCK-B) and CCK-1 receptors tends to trigger anxiety and panic-like states. GB-115 works as an antagonist at these cholecystokinin receptors, meaning it occupies the receptor and blocks CCK from setting off that anxiety signaling. In animal work it specifically prevented anxiety provoked by CCK-4, which shares a pharmacological target with GB-115. This CCK-blocking mechanism is the proposed explanation for its calming effect, and it is distinct from the GABA system that classic sedatives act on.NAP comes from ADNP, a protein essential for brain development. In cell and animal studies it interacts with microtubule end-binding proteins (EB1 and EB3), promoting microtubule stability and reducing tau phosphorylation, which is why it was aimed at tauopathies like PSP and Alzheimer's disease. Mutations in the ADNP gene itself cause ADNP syndrome (Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome), and in ADNP-deficient mice NAP improved some behavioral and neural measures, the rationale for that newer program. The PSP trial did not include target-engagement measures, so it never showed the drug was actually doing this in human brains.
Common Dosing
6 mg daily (2 mg three times daily)
2-3 times daily (morning, afternoon, evening)
30 mg intranasal twice daily (PSP trial dose)
Once or twice daily
AdministrationOral tablets or sublingualIntranasal spray (an IV form, AL-208, was tested in cardiac surgery)
Typical Duration21+ days in clinical trials, effects noted by day 712 weeks to 52 weeks in trials
Best Time to TakeMorning and throughout the dayTwice daily (trial schedule)
Possible Side Effects
May vary by individual
  • Generally well-tolerated
  • Minimal sedation compared to benzodiazepines
  • Headache (rare)
  • Mild gastrointestinal discomfort
  • No reported dependency or withdrawal
  • +1 more
  • Nosebleeds (12% vs 8% on placebo in the PSP trial)
  • Runny nose (10% vs 5%)
  • Nasal discomfort (10% vs under 1%)
  • Headache
  • Serious adverse events and deaths in the PSP trial were similar to placebo
  • +1 more
Research SummaryThe research record is real but thin and almost entirely from a single Russian group. In rodent studies (rats, BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice), GB-115 reduced anxiety induced by CCK-4 and by yohimbine, with effects that varied by mouse strain, and it stayed effective after long-term dosing without producing tolerance or a withdrawal syndrome when stopped. Preclinical safety work has also been published. The only human data comes from a small pilot clinical study of 25 patients with generalized anxiety disorder given 6 mg daily for 21 days, where anxiety scores on the Hamilton scale fell substantially and fatigue scores improved. Importantly, that study was a single-arm pilot with no placebo or control group, so it cannot prove the drug caused the improvement. There are no large randomized controlled trials, no Western regulatory approval, and the evidence base remains preliminary.The headline result is negative. In the phase 2/3 PSP trial (Boxer and colleagues, Lancet Neurology 2014), 313 patients got 30 mg intranasal davunetide twice daily or placebo for 52 weeks. Disease progression was identical in both groups on both primary measures (PSP Rating Scale and Schwab and England daily living scale), and the authors concluded davunetide is not an effective treatment for PSP. Earlier phase 2 work was mixed: a 12-week trial in 144 people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment hinted at working-memory benefits, and a schizophrenia trial missed one co-primary endpoint while hitting another. The original developer, Allon Therapeutics, stopped investing and was later absorbed by Paladin Labs. The revival comes from the inventor's group: post hoc reanalyses of the PSP data (Translational Psychiatry 2023, Molecular Psychiatry 2026) report that women declined faster than men and that davunetide slowed decline in women only. A similar sex-split reanalysis of the MCI trial was published in 2024. These findings are interesting but are subgroup analyses of trials that failed overall, done by researchers tied to the company now developing the drug (ExoNavis Therapeutics), so they need a new prospective trial to mean much. ExoNavis has said a phase 3 in children with ADNP syndrome began in 2024, but Alzforum could not find it in trial registries. Davunetide holds FDA orphan and rare pediatric disease designations and EMA orphan status for ADNP syndrome.

Frequently Asked Questions: GB-115 vs Davunetide

What is the difference between GB-115 and Davunetide?

GB-115 is a cognitive peptide that gb-115 is a synthetic dipeptide anxiolytic developed in russia, chemically the amide of n-phenylhexanoyl-glycyl-l-tryptophan and described as a retro-analogue of cholecystokinin-4. rather than acting like a benzodiazepine, it blocks cholecystokinin receptors, a different anti-anxiety route. it has been studied in animals and in a small pilot human study, but it is not an approved or widely available medication. Davunetide is a cognitive peptide that davunetide (nap) is an eight-amino-acid fragment (napvsipq) of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (adnp), discovered at tel aviv university and given as a nasal spray. it was meant to protect brain cells by stabilizing microtubules, the scaffolding that tau normally supports. its big test, a phase 2/3 trial in progressive supranuclear palsy (psp), failed cleanly in 2012, and development stalled. it has since been revived by its inventors, who argue it works in women and are pursuing adnp syndrome, but those claims rest on reanalyses of old data, not a new successful trial. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Which is better, GB-115 or Davunetide?

Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. GB-115 is typically used for cognitive purposes, while Davunetide is used for cognitive. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.

Can GB-115 and Davunetide be used together?

Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using GB-115 and Davunetide together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.

Related Comparisons

View Full Peptide Profiles