For laboratory and research use only. Not for human consumption.
Comparison

CJC-1295 (No DAC) vs MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research

CJC-1295 (No DAC)

Also: CJC-1295 DAC, CJC-1295 no DAC

Clinical Trials

CJC-1295 is a synthetic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), specifically a modified GHRH(1-29). The name covers two different products. CJC-1295 with DAC (Drug Affinity Complex) binds blood albumin, which stretches its half-life to roughly 6 to 8 days and raises GH and IGF-I for days from a single injection; this is the version ConjuChem took to Phase II before abandoning it, and the version the human data are about. CJC-1295 without DAC (Modified GRF 1-29, the form this page is named for) lacks the albumin tether and is much shorter acting, though its human half-life has not been formally published. Neither is an approved drug, both are sold only as research chemicals, and GHRH analogs are banned in sport by WADA.

Growth HormoneLimited Human Data
MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)

Also: Mechano Growth Factor, IGF-1Ec

Preclinical

MGF is the name given to a splice variant of the IGF-1 gene (IGF-1Ec in humans, IGF-1Eb in rodents) that muscle switches on after loading or damage. The "MGF" sold as a peptide is usually a synthetic 24-amino-acid copy of that variant's unique tail end (the E-domain, sequence YQPPSTNKNTKSQRRKGSTFEEHK), often with a modified C-terminus. It got famous through early lab work from Geoffrey Goldspink's group suggesting it kicks muscle stem cells into action. The honest picture is messier: a careful 2014 pharma replication found no effect on muscle cells at all, nobody has shown the free peptide actually exists in the body, and there are zero human trials.

Growth HormonePreclinical

Key Comparison Insights

  • Both peptides belong to the Growth Hormone category, suggesting similar primary applications.
  • CJC-1295 (No DAC) has stronger research evidence (Limited Human Data) compared to MGF (Mechano Growth Factor) (Preclinical).

Detailed Comparison

AttributeCJC-1295 (No DAC)MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)
CategoryGrowth HormoneGrowth Hormone
FDA StatusNot FDA ApprovedNot FDA Approved
Clinical Status
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Mechanism of ActionCJC-1295 acts at the GHRH receptor on pituitary somatotroph cells, the same receptor the body's own GHRH uses, prompting the pituitary to synthesize and release growth hormone. Native GHRH is broken down within minutes; CJC-1295 with DAC carries a reactive group that covalently bonds to circulating albumin after injection, shielding it from breakdown and stretching its half-life from minutes to days. The sustained GH elevation drives the liver to produce IGF-I, the downstream hormone behind many of GH's tissue effects. There are two versions: with DAC (long-acting, albumin-binding) and without DAC (Modified GRF 1-29), which lacks the albumin tether. Because it works through the pituitary, it relies on the gland's own GH-producing capacity.The idea goes like this. When muscle is stretched or injured, the IGF-1 gene is spliced differently, producing a version with a different C-terminal E-domain. Researchers proposed that this E-domain gets cut off and acts on its own, pushing satellite cells (muscle stem cells) to multiply before mature IGF-1 tells them to fuse and build new fibers. Several studies reported that the E-peptide works without the classic IGF-1 receptor, and in heart cells it was reported to enter the cell, travel to the nucleus, and block the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. The problem is that nobody has identified MGF's receptor, a 2010 Endocrinology review pointed out that no matching peptide has ever been isolated from cells, tissue or blood, and a 2014 study from Novartis and another drug company could not reproduce the core muscle-cell effects. So the mechanism is a hypothesis built on synthetic-peptide experiments, not established biology.
Common Dosing
100 mcg daily (no DAC) or 2 mg weekly (with DAC)
Daily (no DAC) or 1-2x weekly (with DAC)
No established human dose
Not established
AdministrationSubcutaneous injectionLocal injection or infusion into tissue in animal studies; research-market products are injected
Typical Duration8-12 weeksSingle treatments or days to weeks in animal models; no human protocols exist
Best Time to TakeBefore bedNot established
Possible Side Effects
May vary by individual
  • Injection site reactions
  • Facial flushing
  • Headache
  • Water retention
  • Dizziness
  • +5 more
  • No human safety data exists
  • Injection site reactions (expected with any injected peptide)
  • Theoretical growth-promoting risk: MGF E-peptide stimulated prostate cancer cell growth in the lab
  • Unknown long-term effects
  • Product identity is uncertain: black-market MGF has been found as modified analogues
  • +1 more
Research SummaryThe key human study is Teichman et al. (2006) in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending-dose trial in healthy adults using the DAC version. A single subcutaneous injection raised mean plasma GH 2- to 10-fold for 6 days or more and IGF-I 1.5- to 3-fold for 9 to 11 days, with cumulative effects on repeat dosing, and was reported as safe and relatively well tolerated short-term. A follow-up study in healthy men found GH still came in pulses rather than a flat line, with trough GH levels rising sharply. An earlier study showed once-daily CJC-1295 normalized growth in GHRH-knockout mice. These are hormone-level and pharmacokinetic studies, not outcome trials: there are no long-term human trials showing fat loss or muscle gain, and no published randomized trial of the popular CJC-1295 plus ipamorelin combination. The no-DAC form has essentially no published human data of its own. Development was halted after Phase II; a single trial death was attributed by the attending physician to pre-existing coronary artery disease rather than the drug, which is reported but not independently confirmed. FDA has also noted reported adverse events including increased heart rate and a systemic vasodilatory reaction. Bottom line: the GH and IGF-I-raising effect of the DAC version is well supported, while real-world efficacy and long-term safety are not.The supportive work is real but almost all in cells and animals. Yang and Goldspink (FEBS Letters, 2002) reported that the E-domain increased myoblast proliferation and delayed differentiation. Kandalla and colleagues (2011) reported it extended the proliferative lifespan of human muscle precursor cells from young donors, but not from old donors. In sheep with induced heart attacks, local MGF E-domain preserved cardiac function and cut compromised heart muscle by about 35% (Carpenter, 2008), and similar heart-protection results came from mouse studies. A gerbil stroke model showed strong neuroprotection (Dluzniewska, 2005). Then the counterpoint: Fornaro and colleagues (Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2014) tested MGF up to 500 ng/ml on mouse and human muscle cells and primary muscle stem cells and saw no effect on proliferation or differentiation, while real IGF-1 worked fine. An accompanying editorial was titled "The Fall of Mechanogrowth Factor?". In humans, the only solid data is about gene expression: heavy leg extensions raised MGF mRNA in young men but not in older men (Hameed, 2003). There are no human dosing studies and no clinical trials. One more flag: MGF E-peptide drove growth of prostate cancer cells in a lab study, and MGF was found overexpressed in prostate cancer tissue (Armakolas, 2010).

Frequently Asked Questions: CJC-1295 (No DAC) vs MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)

What is the difference between CJC-1295 (No DAC) and MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)?

CJC-1295 (No DAC) is a growth hormone peptide that cjc-1295 is a synthetic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (ghrh), specifically a modified ghrh(1-29). the name covers two different products. cjc-1295 with dac (drug affinity complex) binds blood albumin, which stretches its half-life to roughly 6 to 8 days and raises gh and igf-i for days from a single injection; this is the version conjuchem took to phase ii before abandoning it, and the version the human data are about. cjc-1295 without dac (modified grf 1-29, the form this page is named for) lacks the albumin tether and is much shorter acting, though its human half-life has not been formally published. neither is an approved drug, both are sold only as research chemicals, and ghrh analogs are banned in sport by wada. MGF (Mechano Growth Factor) is a growth hormone peptide that mgf is the name given to a splice variant of the igf-1 gene (igf-1ec in humans, igf-1eb in rodents) that muscle switches on after loading or damage. the "mgf" sold as a peptide is usually a synthetic 24-amino-acid copy of that variant's unique tail end (the e-domain, sequence yqppstnkntksqrrkgstfeehk), often with a modified c-terminus. it got famous through early lab work from geoffrey goldspink's group suggesting it kicks muscle stem cells into action. the honest picture is messier: a careful 2014 pharma replication found no effect on muscle cells at all, nobody has shown the free peptide actually exists in the body, and there are zero human trials. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Which is better, CJC-1295 (No DAC) or MGF (Mechano Growth Factor)?

Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. CJC-1295 (No DAC) is typically used for growth hormone purposes, while MGF (Mechano Growth Factor) is used for growth hormone. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.

Can CJC-1295 (No DAC) and MGF (Mechano Growth Factor) be used together?

Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using CJC-1295 (No DAC) and MGF (Mechano Growth Factor) together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.

Related Comparisons

View Full Peptide Profiles