AOD-9604 vs NA-931
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research
Also: Anti-Obesity Drug 9604, Tyr-hGH Fragment 177-191
AOD-9604 is a synthetic fragment of human growth hormone, copying just the last 15 amino acids of the hormone (residues 176 to 191) plus a tyrosine cap. The idea was to keep the fat-burning end of growth hormone while leaving out the part that raises IGF-1 or messes with blood sugar. It was developed by Metabolic Pharmaceuticals in Australia and tested as an anti-obesity drug, but it is not approved by the FDA or any major regulator, and development stopped after it missed its weight-loss targets.
Also: Bioglutide, cyclic glycine-proline
NA-931 (Bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of IGF-1. Its developer, Biomed Industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person Phase 2 trial. Those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to ClinicalTrials.gov. The same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a Sigma-Aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify.
Key Comparison Insights
- Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.
Detailed Comparison
| Attribute | AOD-9604 | NA-931 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Weight Loss | Weight Loss |
| FDA Status | Not FDA Approved | Not FDA Approved |
| Clinical Status | Pre I II III IV FDA | Pre I II III IV FDA |
| Mechanism of Action | In lab and animal studies, AOD-9604 appears to nudge fat cells toward breaking down stored fat (lipolysis) and away from making new fat (lipogenesis), echoing the lipolytic tail-end of the full growth hormone molecule. Unlike real growth hormone, it does this without meaningfully raising IGF-1, the downstream growth signal that drives growth hormone's anabolic and blood-sugar effects. The exact receptor it works through is not pinned down, and a clean, growth-hormone-receptor-independent pathway remains a working hypothesis rather than settled science. In short, the proposed selling point is fat-burning signaling without the classic growth hormone baggage, but the molecular details are still fuzzy. | Cyclic glycine-proline is a diketopiperazine: glycine and proline joined into a small ring, 154 daltons, roughly a thirtieth the size of tirzepatide or retatrutide. The independent literature, mostly from Jian Guan's group in Auckland, describes a single mechanism: cGP competes with IGF-1 for binding to IGFBP-3, which frees up IGF-1 that was otherwise bound and inactive. That is a bioavailability effect, studied for stroke recovery, Parkinson's and blood pressure rather than for weight. Biomed's own patent filing (WO2025160184A1) goes much further, claiming the same molecule is a 'quadruple receptor agonist' at IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. That claim is worth understanding properly, because it is the entire basis of the weight-loss story. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors are class B GPCRs, the kind that normally need a thirty-plus residue peptide wrapping into the receptor's binding groove to switch on. A 154-dalton ring activating all three would be a genuinely significant pharmacological finding. No independent group has reported it. Searching PubMed for cyclic glycine-proline alongside GLP-1 returns nothing at all. |
| Common Dosing | 300 mcg daily Once daily, usually morning, fasted | 120 mg daily, oral Once daily |
| Administration | Subcutaneous injection or oral (studied both) | Oral capsule or tablet, once daily |
| Typical Duration | 12-24 weeks in studies | 28 days in Phase 1, 13 weeks in Phase 2 |
| Best Time to Take | Morning (fasted) | Consistent daily timing |
Possible Side Effects May vary by individual |
|
|
| Research Summary | The animal and cell data look encouraging, but the human story is where it falls apart. Across roughly six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving about 900 people, a safety review published in the Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Moré et al.) found AOD-9604 was well tolerated, did not raise IGF-1, did not harm glucose metabolism, and triggered no detectable antibodies. The catch: it did not deliver clinically meaningful weight loss. The largest Phase IIb obesity trial failed to beat placebo on its main endpoint, and Metabolic Pharmaceuticals halted clinical development around 2007. So the honest summary is a peptide with a clean safety record in humans and essentially no proven efficacy for fat loss in humans. | There are no peer-reviewed publications on NA-931. Not one. Everything in circulation is a conference abstract, and the abstracts carrying the efficacy numbers list Biomed's CEO as sole author with conflicts declared as 'None'. Two trials have completed, both run entirely in Australia: a 74-person Phase 1 (NCT06615700, completed September 2024) and a 126-person Phase 2 (NCT06564753, completed April 2025). Neither has results posted. A third trial (NCT06732245) would run in the US, Australia and New Zealand, but has not started recruiting. The reported weight loss is where this gets difficult. The same 126-person Phase 2 has been presented three times with three different numbers: 14.8 percent at ADA in June 2025, 13.8 percent at ENDO in July, and 13.8 percent with a different placebo-adjusted figure in a September press release. Enrolment is given as 125 in the abstracts against 126 on the registry. A result that moves between presentations is not yet a result. The company's website states NA-931 is in Phase 3. No Phase 3 trial for NA-931 is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The announcement traces to a single paid newswire release in January 2026, syndicated into around twenty local newspaper press-release sections, which reads like broad coverage but is one purchased placement. |
Frequently Asked Questions: AOD-9604 vs NA-931
What is the difference between AOD-9604 and NA-931?
AOD-9604 is a weight loss peptide that aod-9604 is a synthetic fragment of human growth hormone, copying just the last 15 amino acids of the hormone (residues 176 to 191) plus a tyrosine cap. the idea was to keep the fat-burning end of growth hormone while leaving out the part that raises igf-1 or messes with blood sugar. it was developed by metabolic pharmaceuticals in australia and tested as an anti-obesity drug, but it is not approved by the fda or any major regulator, and development stopped after it missed its weight-loss targets. NA-931 is a weight loss peptide that na-931 (bioglutide) is cyclic glycine-proline, a two-amino-acid ring that occurs naturally as a breakdown product of igf-1. its developer, biomed industries, describes it as an oral once-daily agonist at four receptors at once - igf-1, glp-1, gip and glucagon - and has reported 13 to 15 percent weight loss in a 126-person phase 2 trial. those numbers have only ever appeared in conference abstracts, never in a peer-reviewed paper, and no trial results have been filed to clinicaltrials.gov. the same molecule is already sold as a consumer brain-health supplement and as a sigma-aldrich catalogue chemical, which makes it unusually cheap to source and unusually hard to verify. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.
Which is better, AOD-9604 or NA-931?
Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. AOD-9604 is typically used for weight loss purposes, while NA-931 is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.
Can AOD-9604 and NA-931 be used together?
Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using AOD-9604 and NA-931 together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.