For laboratory and research use only. Not for human consumption.
Comparison

AOD-9604 vs Amycretin

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research

AOD-9604

Also: Anti-Obesity Drug 9604, Tyr-hGH Fragment 177-191

Clinical Trials

AOD-9604 is a synthetic fragment of human growth hormone: residues 177 to 191 of the hormone with an extra tyrosine added at the front, 16 amino acids in total. The idea was to keep the fat-burning end of growth hormone while leaving out the part that raises IGF-1 or messes with blood sugar. It was developed by Metabolic Pharmaceuticals in Australia and tested as an anti-obesity drug, but it is not approved by the FDA or any major regulator, development stopped after its big Phase IIb trial missed its weight-loss target, and it is banned in sport by WADA.

Weight LossHuman Trials
Amycretin

Also: Zenagamtide, NNC0487-0111

Clinical Trials

Amycretin is Novo Nordisk's single-molecule agonist of both the GLP-1 and amylin receptors, developed as a once-weekly injection and a once-daily pill. Early trials produced some of the biggest weight-loss numbers seen with any obesity drug so far, and the injectable version entered phase 3 (the AMAZE program) in 2026. It is not approved anywhere, and everything known about it comes from company-run trials of up to 36 weeks.

Weight LossHuman Trials

Key Comparison Insights

  • Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.

Detailed Comparison

AttributeAOD-9604Amycretin
CategoryWeight LossWeight Loss
FDA StatusNot FDA ApprovedNot FDA Approved
Clinical Status
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Mechanism of ActionIn lab and animal studies, AOD-9604 appears to nudge fat cells toward breaking down stored fat (lipolysis) and away from making new fat (lipogenesis), echoing the lipolytic tail-end of the full growth hormone molecule. Unlike real growth hormone, it does this without meaningfully raising IGF-1, the downstream growth signal that drives growth hormone's anabolic and blood-sugar effects. The exact receptor it works through is not pinned down, and a clean, growth-hormone-receptor-independent pathway remains a working hypothesis rather than settled science. In short, the proposed selling point is fat-burning signaling without the classic growth hormone baggage, but the molecular details are still fuzzy.Amycretin hits two appetite systems at once. The GLP-1 side slows stomach emptying, boosts insulin release after meals, and dampens appetite in the brain, the same biology behind semaglutide. The amylin side mimics a hormone your pancreas releases alongside insulin, which acts on the brainstem to make you feel full sooner and also curbs glucagon after eating. Novo combined these two signals in one molecule rather than mixing two drugs (which is what its CagriSema combination does). The bet is that the two pathways add together, giving more weight loss than either alone. That idea fits the early data, but it has not yet been tested head-to-head against semaglutide or tirzepatide in a large trial.
Common Dosing
300 mcg daily
Once daily, usually morning, fasted
Trial doses of 1.25-40 mg once weekly (injection)
Once weekly (injection) or once daily (tablet)
AdministrationSubcutaneous injection or oral (studied both)Subcutaneous injection once weekly, or oral tablet once daily (separate formulations)
Typical Duration12-24 weeks in studies20-36 weeks in published trials; phase 3 runs longer
Best Time to TakeMorning (fasted)Same day each week (injection); trial protocols set timing for the tablet
Possible Side Effects
May vary by individual
  • Generally very well-tolerated
  • Injection site reactions
  • Mild headache
  • Dizziness
  • Does NOT produce typical HGH side effects
  • +1 more
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhea and constipation
  • Reduced appetite
  • GI effects rise with dose and are most common during escalation
  • +2 more
Research SummaryThe animal and cell data look encouraging, but the human story is where it falls apart. Across roughly six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving about 900 people, a safety review published in the Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Moré et al.) found AOD-9604 was well tolerated, did not raise IGF-1, did not harm glucose metabolism, and triggered no detectable antibodies. The catch: it did not deliver clinically meaningful weight loss. The largest trial, a 24-week Phase IIb study in several hundred obese adults, failed to beat placebo on weight loss, and Metabolic Pharmaceuticals dropped obesity development around 2007. So the honest summary is a peptide with a clean safety record in humans and essentially no proven efficacy for fat loss in humans.Two early trials were published in The Lancet in June 2025. In the subcutaneous phase 1b/2a trial (125 adults with overweight or obesity), the estimated weight loss assuming full adherence was 24.3% at 60 mg over 36 weeks and 22.0% at 20 mg over 36 weeks, versus roughly flat weight on placebo, with no plateau by the end of treatment. A separate phase 1 trial of the oral tablet (144 people, 12 weeks) showed up to 13.1% loss at the highest dose. In November 2025 Novo reported a 36-week phase 2 trial in 448 adults with type 2 diabetes: up to 14.5% weight loss with weekly injections (2.6% on placebo), up to 10.1% with the daily pill, and HbA1c drops of up to 1.8 points. Side effects were mostly gastrointestinal, dose-related, and mild to moderate. Novo moved both forms into phase 3; AMAZE 1 (weekly injection at 1.25, 5, 20 or 40 mg versus placebo, about 1,150 people without diabetes) is registered as NCT07339423 with completion expected in 2029. Honest caveats: the headline numbers come from small trials using an efficacy estimand that assumes everyone stayed on drug, and long-term safety is unknown.

Frequently Asked Questions: AOD-9604 vs Amycretin

What is the difference between AOD-9604 and Amycretin?

AOD-9604 is a weight loss peptide that aod-9604 is a synthetic fragment of human growth hormone: residues 177 to 191 of the hormone with an extra tyrosine added at the front, 16 amino acids in total. the idea was to keep the fat-burning end of growth hormone while leaving out the part that raises igf-1 or messes with blood sugar. it was developed by metabolic pharmaceuticals in australia and tested as an anti-obesity drug, but it is not approved by the fda or any major regulator, development stopped after its big phase iib trial missed its weight-loss target, and it is banned in sport by wada. Amycretin is a weight loss peptide that amycretin is novo nordisk's single-molecule agonist of both the glp-1 and amylin receptors, developed as a once-weekly injection and a once-daily pill. early trials produced some of the biggest weight-loss numbers seen with any obesity drug so far, and the injectable version entered phase 3 (the amaze program) in 2026. it is not approved anywhere, and everything known about it comes from company-run trials of up to 36 weeks. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Which is better, AOD-9604 or Amycretin?

Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. AOD-9604 is typically used for weight loss purposes, while Amycretin is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.

Can AOD-9604 and Amycretin be used together?

Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using AOD-9604 and Amycretin together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.

Related Comparisons

View Full Peptide Profiles