For laboratory and research use only. Not for human consumption.
Comparison

Adipotide vs Petrelintide

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research

Adipotide

Also: FTPP, Fat-Targeted Proapoptotic Peptide

Preclinical

Adipotide is an experimental peptide built to kill fat tissue by cutting off its blood supply. One half homes in on prohibitin, a protein on the blood vessels that feed white fat, and the other half is a cell-killing sequence that triggers those vessel cells to self-destruct. It produced striking weight loss in obese mice and monkeys, but it also caused kidney damage in every primate species tested, and its only human trial was terminated after enrolling 4 people with no results ever posted.

Weight LossAnimal Studies
Petrelintide

Also: ZP8396

Clinical Trials

Petrelintide is a long-acting amylin analog from Zealand Pharma, co-developed with Roche, designed as a once-weekly injection for obesity. The pitch is gentler weight loss than GLP-1 drugs but with far less nausea and vomiting. Two phase 2 trials read out positively in 2026 (up to 10.7% weight loss at 42 weeks), and a roughly 7,000-person phase 3 program has started. It is not approved anywhere.

Weight LossHuman Trials

Key Comparison Insights

  • Both peptides belong to the Weight Loss category, suggesting similar primary applications.
  • Petrelintide has stronger research evidence (Human Trials) compared to Adipotide (Animal Studies).

Detailed Comparison

AttributeAdipotidePetrelintide
CategoryWeight LossWeight Loss
FDA StatusNot FDA ApprovedNot FDA Approved
Clinical Status
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Pre
I
II
III
IV
FDA
Mechanism of ActionThe molecule has two parts joined together. The targeting part, CKGGRAKDC, was found by screening peptides in living mice for ones that stick to fat-tissue blood vessels; it binds prohibitin on the endothelial cells lining white fat vasculature. The payload, D(KLAKLAK)2, is a known pro-apoptotic peptide that disrupts mitochondrial membranes once inside a cell, setting off programmed cell death. Kill the vessels and the fat tissue they supply is starved and resorbed. This is a destructive mechanism, not a metabolic nudge like GLP-1 drugs, and that matters for safety: prohibitin is not exclusive to fat vessels, and the kidney's proximal tubule cells turned out to be a clear off-target casualty in monkeys.Amylin is a hormone your pancreas releases alongside insulin after meals. It acts on the brainstem to make you feel full sooner, slows stomach emptying, and curbs glucagon after eating. Zealand says amylin signaling also helps restore sensitivity to leptin, the body's long-term fullness signal. Native amylin is unusable as a drug because it clumps into fibrils and lasts minutes, so petrelintide was engineered to stay stable at neutral pH, avoid fibril formation, and last a week. That stability also means it can be co-formulated with other peptides, which is why Roche plans to combine it with its own GLP-1/GIP drug. The theory is that amylin gives more of a natural fullness feeling than GLP-1 drugs do, with fewer GI side effects; the tolerability part looks real so far, the bigger-picture claims still need phase 3.
Common Dosing
No established human dose
Once daily in animal studies
Not publicly disclosed (once-weekly trial doses)
Once weekly
AdministrationSubcutaneous injectionSubcutaneous injection once weekly
Typical Duration28 days in the main monkey efficacy study; up to 63 days in dose-escalation16 weeks (phase 1b) to 42 weeks (phase 2) in completed trials
Best Time to TakeNo evidence-based timingSame day each week
Possible Side Effects
May vary by individual
  • Kidney injury (proximal tubule damage) in all primate species tested
  • Rising creatinine, dose-dependent
  • Glucose and protein in the urine
  • Dehydration and increased urine output at higher doses
  • Low phosphorus and potassium
  • +3 more
  • Nausea (mostly mild, mainly during dose escalation)
  • Diarrhea and constipation at rates similar to placebo in phase 2
  • Vomiting uncommon (none at the maximally effective dose in ZUPREME-1)
  • Reduced appetite
  • No long-term human safety data
Research SummaryThe concept came from Kolonin and colleagues (Nature Medicine, 2004), who reported that ablating fat vasculature reversed obesity in mice. The key primate study is Barnhart et al. (Science Translational Medicine, 2011) from MD Anderson. Obese rhesus monkeys given 0.43 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 28 days lost 7.4% to 14.7% of body weight (average 10.6%) while controls stayed roughly flat, with MRI and DEXA confirming fat loss and clear improvements in insulin resistance. Lean monkeys at the same dose did not lose weight. The cost: serum creatinine rose in a dose-dependent way above 0.25 mg/kg, and the authors documented kidney tubule injury with glucose and protein in the urine, dehydration at higher doses, and low phosphorus and potassium. Most of it reversed within 28 days, but one treated monkey in each study still had residual changes. A first-in-human phase I trial at MD Anderson in obese men with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT01262664) started in 2012, enrolled only 4 patients, and was terminated at the investigator's request in 2019 with no results posted. That is the whole human record. Nobody knows the safe human dose, and the kidney signal is the opposite of reassuring.A 16-week phase 1b trial (48 people) reported up to 8.6% mean weight loss at the highest dose versus 1.7% on placebo, with no early plateau. The phase 2 ZUPREME-1 trial (493 people with obesity or overweight, mean BMI 37) reported in March 2026 up to 10.7% mean weight loss at 42 weeks versus 1.7% on placebo. That is clearly less than semaglutide or tirzepatide produce, but tolerability stood out: no vomiting at the maximally effective dose, and side-effect dropouts (4.8%) no higher than placebo (4.9%). ZUPREME-2 (220 people with obesity and type 2 diabetes) reported in October 2026: 7.4-9.2% weight loss at 28 weeks versus 2.0% on placebo, placebo-adjusted HbA1c drops of 0.61-0.88 points, and GI dropouts of 1.9% versus 1.7%. Roche and Zealand have started phase 3a (ZUPREME-3, -4 and -5, about 7,000 people in total, including a cardiovascular-disease population). Honest take: a well-tolerated, moderate-strength drug whose real value may be as a combination partner, and the full peer-reviewed phase 2 data are still pending.

Frequently Asked Questions: Adipotide vs Petrelintide

What is the difference between Adipotide and Petrelintide?

Adipotide is a weight loss peptide that adipotide is an experimental peptide built to kill fat tissue by cutting off its blood supply. one half homes in on prohibitin, a protein on the blood vessels that feed white fat, and the other half is a cell-killing sequence that triggers those vessel cells to self-destruct. it produced striking weight loss in obese mice and monkeys, but it also caused kidney damage in every primate species tested, and its only human trial was terminated after enrolling 4 people with no results ever posted. Petrelintide is a weight loss peptide that petrelintide is a long-acting amylin analog from zealand pharma, co-developed with roche, designed as a once-weekly injection for obesity. the pitch is gentler weight loss than glp-1 drugs but with far less nausea and vomiting. two phase 2 trials read out positively in 2026 (up to 10.7% weight loss at 42 weeks), and a roughly 7,000-person phase 3 program has started. it is not approved anywhere. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Which is better, Adipotide or Petrelintide?

Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. Adipotide is typically used for weight loss purposes, while Petrelintide is used for weight loss. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.

Can Adipotide and Petrelintide be used together?

Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using Adipotide and Petrelintide together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.

Related Comparisons

View Full Peptide Profiles