Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 vs SYN-AKE
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of mechanisms, dosing, side effects, and research
Also: Eyeseryl, Ac-beta-Ala-His-Ser-His
Acetyl tetrapeptide-5 is a short synthetic peptide sold by Lipotec (now Lubrizol) as Eyeseryl, made for eye creams that target under-eye puffiness. The pitch is that it reduces fluid leaking into the tissue under the eyes. It is a cosmetic ingredient, and nearly all of the human data comes from the company that sells it.
Also: Dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate, SYN-AKE
SYN-AKE is DSM's trade name for dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate, the 'snake venom' peptide in a lot of anti-wrinkle creams. The marketing says it mimics Waglerin-1, a toxin from the temple viper. To be clear: there is no venom in it. It is a tiny synthetic molecule, and the evidence that it relaxes wrinkles comes almost entirely from the manufacturer.
Key Comparison Insights
- Both peptides belong to the Skin & Hair category, suggesting similar primary applications.
Detailed Comparison
| Attribute | Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 | SYN-AKE |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Skin & Hair | Skin & Hair |
| FDA Status | Not FDA Approved | Not FDA Approved |
| Clinical Status | Pre I II III IV FDA | Pre I II III IV FDA |
| Mechanism of Action | The peptide is acetyl-beta-alanine-histidine-serine-histidine. The manufacturer's lab work claims three effects: it reduces vascular permeability (less fluid seeping out of small blood vessels, tested in an endothelial cell model), it inhibits glycation (sugar damage to proteins like collagen), and it has some ACE-inhibiting activity that is linked to fluid balance. All of that is in vitro and company-generated. An important reality check: under-eye bags have several causes, and a lot of them in older adults come from fat pads pushing forward and loose skin, not fluid. A peptide aimed at fluid cannot touch fat-pad bags, so even in the best case it fits morning puffiness better than structural eye bags. | DSM describes SYN-AKE as a reversible blocker of the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the receptor on muscle that acetylcholine opens to make it contract. Block it, the theory goes, and facial muscles relax a little. That is the real mechanism of Waglerin-1, a 22-amino-acid viper toxin that independent research shows selectively blocks the adult form of this receptor. SYN-AKE itself is a much smaller molecule (beta-alanine, proline and diaminobutyric acid with a benzylamide end, under 500 daltons), and the claim that it does the same thing comes from the manufacturer's own cell test, where innervated muscle cells contracted less. Even DSM's older material calls the binding 'probable'. As with Argireline, there is no independent proof that a cream gets enough of it to facial muscle to matter. |
| Common Dosing | 1% of the Eyeseryl solution in an eye cream Twice daily | 1-4% of the SYN-AKE solution in a finished product Once or twice daily |
| Administration | Topical (eye creams, gels, serums) | Topical (serums, creams) |
| Typical Duration | 28-60 days in manufacturer studies; ongoing use to maintain any effect | 28 days in the manufacturer study; ongoing use to maintain any effect |
| Best Time to Take | Morning and evening, gently patted under the eyes | Morning and/or evening, on clean skin |
Possible Side Effects May vary by individual |
|
|
| Research Summary | We could not find an independent, peer-reviewed clinical trial of acetyl tetrapeptide-5. The evidence is manufacturer data reported in trade publications. Lipotec's best-known study used a 1% Eyeseryl cream on one eye and placebo on the other in male volunteers aged 30 to 65, twice daily for 28 days, and reported about a 30% reduction in under-eye puffiness volume, with most volunteers rating it positively. Another supplier document describes a 60-day study in 20 women using a cream with a very low peptide level, scored from photos by a dermatologist. Other summaries quote different numbers (17% to 21%) from studies we could not trace to an original paper. The studies differ in concentration, sex, length and how puffiness was measured, so they cannot be pooled. Independent ingredient databases rate the evidence as limited for exactly this reason. Bottom line: plausible for mild fluid puffiness, cheap to try in an eye cream, but not a fix for true eye bags and not backed by independent trials. | DSM's brochure reports two pieces of data. In vitro, 0.5 mM of the peptide cut the contraction frequency of innervated muscle cells. In vivo, a 4% SYN-AKE cream was compared with placebo in 15 volunteers per group (aged 40-60), applied twice daily for 28 days, with reductions of roughly 15-21% in skin roughness and wrinkle measures and a headline of 'up to 52%' wrinkle reduction in the best responders. A US patent also describes a double-blind study in 59 women aged 40-55 reporting smaller pores and less shine after 28 days, but that is a patent filing, not a peer-reviewed paper. A 2020 review of cosmetic peptides states plainly that there are no scientific papers describing clinical studies of this peptide, so the efficacy story rests on company data. Bottom line: a well-tolerated cosmetic ingredient with a catchy story. The venom angle is marketing, and the 'up to 52%' number is a best case from a 15-person company study, not a typical result. |
Frequently Asked Questions: Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 vs SYN-AKE
What is the difference between Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 and SYN-AKE?
Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 is a skin & hair peptide that acetyl tetrapeptide-5 is a short synthetic peptide sold by lipotec (now lubrizol) as eyeseryl, made for eye creams that target under-eye puffiness. the pitch is that it reduces fluid leaking into the tissue under the eyes. it is a cosmetic ingredient, and nearly all of the human data comes from the company that sells it. SYN-AKE is a skin & hair peptide that syn-ake is dsm's trade name for dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate, the 'snake venom' peptide in a lot of anti-wrinkle creams. the marketing says it mimics waglerin-1, a toxin from the temple viper. to be clear: there is no venom in it. it is a tiny synthetic molecule, and the evidence that it relaxes wrinkles comes almost entirely from the manufacturer. The main differences lie in their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.
Which is better, Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 or SYN-AKE?
Neither is universally "better" - the choice depends on your specific goals. Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 is typically used for skin & hair purposes, while SYN-AKE is used for skin & hair. Always consult with a healthcare provider to determine which may be appropriate for your situation.
Can Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 and SYN-AKE be used together?
Some peptide protocols combine multiple compounds for synergistic effects. However, using Acetyl Tetrapeptide-5 and SYN-AKE together should only be considered under medical supervision, as both compounds have their own side effect profiles and potential interactions. Research on their combined use may be limited.